🔗 Share this article

One of the most famous pictures from the twentieth century portrays a nude young girl, her limbs spread wide, her expression contorted in terror, her body blistered and flaking. She appears fleeing towards the camera while escaping an airstrike during the conflict. Beside her, additional kids are racing away from the devastated village of the area, against a backdrop of black clouds and soldiers.

This Global Effect of a Powerful Picture

Within hours its distribution during the Vietnam War, this picture—originally titled "The Terror of War"—evolved into a traditional phenomenon. Viewed and discussed by millions, it is generally attributed with energizing global sentiment opposing the American involvement during that era. A prominent critic afterwards remarked how this profoundly lasting image featuring the young the girl in distress probably had a greater impact to increase global outrage toward the conflict compared to a hundred hours of broadcast barbarities. A renowned British documentarian who covered the conflict called it the single best photo of what became known as the televised conflict. Another seasoned photojournalist remarked how the photograph represents simply put, a pivotal photos ever taken, especially of the Vietnam war.

A Long-Standing Credit and a Recent Assertion

For half a century, the photo was credited to a South Vietnamese photographer, a then-21-year-old South Vietnamese photographer employed by a major news agency in Saigon. But a provocative recent film streaming on a popular platform contends that the famous picture—often hailed as the apex of war journalism—might have been taken by a different man at the location in the village.

According to the film, the iconic image was in fact captured by a stringer, who provided the images to the AP. The allegation, along with the documentary's following research, stems from a man named Carl Robinson, who states that the powerful bureau head instructed the staff to alter the image’s credit from the freelancer to Út, the sole AP staff photographer there at the time.

The Search for the Truth

The source, currently elderly, contacted one of the journalists in 2022, seeking support to identify the unnamed cameraman. He stated that, should he still be alive, he wished to extend an acknowledgment. The journalist reflected on the unsupported photojournalists he had met—comparing them to modern freelancers, similar to independent journalists during the war, are frequently overlooked. Their contributions is commonly doubted, and they function under much more difficult circumstances. They lack insurance, no retirement plans, they don’t have support, they usually are without adequate tools, making them highly exposed as they capture images in their own communities.

The investigator wondered: How would it feel for the man who made this photograph, if in fact he was not the author?” From a photographic perspective, he thought, it must be profoundly difficult. As an observer of photojournalism, particularly the vaunted combat images from that war, it could prove groundbreaking, maybe legacy-altering. The revered history of the image within the diaspora is such that the director who had family left at the time felt unsure to take on the film. He expressed, I hesitated to challenge this long-held narrative that credited Nick the image. I also feared to disrupt the status quo among a group that always respected this achievement.”

The Search Progresses

But the two the investigator and the creator concluded: it was important asking the question. “If journalists are going to keep the world accountable,” remarked the investigator, it is essential that we be able to address tough issues of ourselves.”

The documentary documents the journalists while conducting their inquiry, from discussions with witnesses, to call-outs in modern Ho Chi Minh City, to archival research from related materials captured during the incident. Their work finally produce a name: a freelancer, working for a television outlet during the attack who sometimes worked as a stringer to international news outlets as a freelancer. In the film, a heartfelt the man, like others in his 80s based in the US, claims that he sold the famous picture to the AP for minimal payment and a print, only to be haunted by not being acknowledged for years.

The Backlash Followed by Additional Scrutiny

The man comes across in the footage, reserved and thoughtful, but his story proved explosive among the field of war photography. {Days before|Shortly prior to